FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media Contacts
[email protected]
410-576-7009
BALTIMORE, MD – Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 26 attorneys general and governors to stop the Trump administration’s continued efforts to use federal funds – specifically, billions of dollars in federal counterterrorism and other funds – to coerce states into complying with the administration’s unrelated political and policy priorities.
Attorney General Brown and the coalition’s lawsuit filed today challenges decisions by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to impose unlawful conditions on billions of dollars in federal funds that Congress appropriated for states to use in preparing for and responding to emergencies and natural disasters, including acts of terrorism. The conditions challenged in the lawsuit would require the states to change the way they conduct elections, including by transmitting lists of all registered voters to DHS, and to assist DHS in enforcing federal immigration law. They would also permit DHS to terminate any federal grant at any time and for any reason.
“The federal government is threatening to cut off funding that protects Marylanders from terrorist attacks and natural disasters unless we go along with its unrelated political agenda,” said Attorney General Brown. “We joined this lawsuit because Marylanders’ safety should never be compromised by politics.”
Attorney General Brown joined two similar lawsuits in 2025, challenging DHS’s efforts to condition billions in federal funding for emergency services and transportation infrastructure on states’ agreement to enforce federal immigration law.
Now, DHS and FEMA have established grant conditions for 2026 funding that again attempt to coerce the states into complying with the administration’s policy priorities. The conditions in total affect billions of dollars in funding, including over a billion dollars in Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) funding that states use to support security measures and protect residents from terrorism, cyberattacks and more. Maryland receives millions of dollars in HSGP funding each year for state and municipal efforts to prevent, prepare for, and respond to acts of terrorism.
First, DHS and FEMA have again threatened to impose the same immigration conditions that they attempted to impose in 2025 on all federal grant programs. The conditions would require states to devote scarce law enforcement resources to assisting DHS in enforcing federal immigration law. These conditions were found to be unlawful and were enjoined by a district judge last year.
Second, DHS and FEMA threaten to withhold 20% of each state’s counterterrorism funding if states do not change state election law to conform to the administration’s policy goals. The coalition asserts that these requirements would force states to abandon years of work and millions of dollars of investments in their elections systems, all to obtain unrelated funding that Congress earmarked for the prevention of terrorist attacks.
Specifically, the challenged funding conditions would require states to transition to paper-ballot systems, conduct a mandatory 5% manual audit of voting systems, reconcile voters and ballots using a methodology DHS has not disclosed, and verify citizenship using DHS’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system, which has been estimated to have a failure rate of up to 10%. If states do not comply, DHS and FEMA will withhold at least 20% of each state’s HSGP funding.
Finally, the challenged funding conditions unlawfully claim effectively unfettered power to terminate these grants on a whim. The agencies are attempting to add a condition that would allow FEMA to terminate any grant program for any reason. This constant threat of termination undermines the stability and reliability that these critical programs rely on to be effective. Indeed, a federal court recently rejected the Trump administration’s attempts to interpret an existing regulation to have that effect.
The coalition argues in today’s lawsuit that the grant conditions violate the Administrative Procedure Act and the U.S. Constitution’s Spending Clause.
Joining Attorney General Brown in filing the lawsuit are attorneys general of California, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaiʻi, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin, as well as the governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania.
###