Assistant Counsel for Contingent Fee Collection of Large Monetary
Judgment(s)
RFP Number: OAG-26.02.27
Issue Date: February 17, 2026
Questions Due Date: March 5, 2026 5:00pm ET
Proposal Due Date: March 16, 2026, 5:00 pm ET
The Office of the Attorney General of the State of Maryland (the “OAG” or “Attorney General”) issues this Request for Proposals (RFP) to engage Assistant Counsel (“Assistant Counsel”), pursuant to State Government Code, §6-105(b), with expertise in the collection of largemonetary judgments. The OAG is soliciting proposals from qualified law firms experienced in matters pertaining to the collection of large monetary judgments using all available judgment enforcement tools, including bank account attachments, wage garnishments, asset mapping and investigation, and real estate attachments. The Assistant Counsel will support the OAG’s Civil Rights Division (“CRD) in the collection of the judgments in the case State of Maryland v. Eric Sessoms, et al., Circuit Court for Wicomico County, Case No. C-22-CV-24-00260 (11/24/25 and 12/02/25) (hereinafter “the Sessoms Case”). Compensation will be on a contingent fee basis. The initial work proposed under RFP will focus on the Sessoms case. However, additional task orders may be issued during the term of the contract term if needed to assist the OAG in collecting other large judgments.
RFP for Assistant Counsel-Contingent Fee Collection-OAG-26.02.27
Expertise in Complex Litigation, Ediscovery Technology, Privacy & First Amendment Law
RFP Number: OAG-26.01.28
Issue Date: February 17, 2026
Questions Due Date: Questions will be responded to on a rolling basis
Proposal Due Date: February 27, 2026, 5:00 pm ET
The Office of the Attorney General of the State of Maryland (the "OAG" or "Attorney General") issues this Request for Proposals (RFP) to engage Assistant Counsel ("Assistant Counsel"), pursuant to State Government Code, 86-105(b), with expertise Complex litigation, including ediscovery, technology, privacy, and 1st Amendment law. The Assistant Counsel will work with the OAG to defend a lawsuit brought by NetChoice against the Attorney General and the Division Chief of the Consumer Protection Division, in their official capacities, challenging the constitutionality of Maryland’s “Kid’s Code.” The Kid’s Code regulates how online platforms, including social media companies, collect and use children’s information to market to children and otherwise.
RFP for Assistant Counsel-Complex Litigation-OAG-26.01.28