FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media Contacts
[email protected]
410-576-7009
BALTIMORE, MD – Anthony G. Brown joined a coalition of 19 attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The brief opposes the Trump administration’s motion to reconsider the court’s ruling quashing the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) subpoena for documents, including patients’ medical records, related to gender affirming care at Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH).
“The Trump administration’s relentless pursuit of transgender youth – which includes demanding their private medical records and threatening their doctors – is a cruel attempt to erase their existence and deny them the medical care they need to be their authentic and true selves,” said Attorney General Brown. “Our Office stands with transgender youth and their families in Maryland and across the country as they fight for their right to live with dignity.”
Since taking office, the Trump administration has attempted to end lawful medical care that it disfavors. On day one, President Trump issued an Executive Order declaring gender identity a “false” idea. A week later, the President issued another Executive Order attempting to strip federal funding from institutions that provide lifesaving gender affirming care for young people under the age of 19, with the ultimate goal of ending all gender affirming care for youth. In April, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memo directing the DOJ to investigate healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies that engage in gender affirming care.
On June 11, the DOJ sent BCH an administrative subpoena, seeking information and documents relating to the hospital’s provision of gender affirming care. This subpoena sought a broad range of highly sensitive and confidential records related to both patients and providers, including personnel records for nearly all BCH employees and extensive patient records.
On September 9, a federal judge voided the DOJ’s subpoena, ruling that it was clearly an attempt to interfere with Massachusetts’s right to protect gender affirming care within its borders and to intimidate BCH and its patients from providing and seeking gender affirming care. The Trump Administration has now filed a motion for the Court to set aside its ruling.
In their brief, the attorneys general urge the Court to uphold its prior ruling quashing the DOJ’s subpoena. They argue that the federal government is clearly seeking to intimidate medical providers from offering critical and medically necessary care to transgender youth, even in states like Maryland where such care is legal and protected. Further, the attorneys general contend that the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) – which the DOJ now broadly interprets to criminalize aspects of routine medical care – does not prohibit medical providers from using approved medications for off-label purposes. In fact, if the DOJ’s interpretation of the FDCA were accepted, entire fields of medicine such as pediatrics and oncology could see their practitioners placed at risk of criminal conviction merely for offering evidence-based treatments.
The states submitting today’s motion have enacted their own laws, policies and protections for transgender residents, including transgender youth under the age of 19. Maryland has enacted laws recognizing the right to access gender-affirming care and shielding people who access or provide gender-affirming care from civil or criminal penalties by out-of-state jurisdictions.
Joining Attorney General Brown in submitting the brief, which was led by Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, were the attorneys general of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
###