FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Media Contacts
[email protected]
410-576-7009
Lawsuit Seeks to Block Unconstitutional USPS Rule that Directs States to Overhaul Vote-by-Mail Procedures on an Impossible Timeline and Risks Disenfranchising Eligible Voters
BALTIMORE, MD – Attorney General Anthony G. Brown today joined a coalition of 25 states in filing a lawsuit against the United States Postal Service (USPS) challenging its new rule that purports to grant USPS the authority to regulate mail voting in elections.
Tens of millions of voters across the country rely on mail-in ballots, and the coalition argues USPS’s rule will prevent states from effectively administering their mail voting programs, putting voters at risk of being disenfranchised.
“At the President’s direction, USPS is trying to seize control of how states run their own elections by weaponizing its authority over the mail to decide who does and doesn’t get a ballot,” said Attorney General Brown. “Our Office will not allow this rule to disenfranchise eligible voters, and we will always defend Marylanders’ right to have their voices heard at the ballot box.”
On March 31, President Trump issued an Executive Order directing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to establish a national list of eligible voters and the U.S. Postal Service to transmit mail ballots only to voters on the list. On August 21, USPS announced a new rule implementing the President’s demands. The rule requires states to register every voter who is eligible to vote by mail with USPS and calls for USPS to compile the registered voters into state-specific lists. The rule also establishes new design requirements for the mail-in ballot envelopes created by states, which states must satisfy and submit to USPS for approval. Under the rule, USPS will not deliver ballots to voters who do not appear on the USPS-generated lists and will not deliver ballots in envelopes that fail to comply with the rule’s new standards.
Attorney General Brown and the coalition argue the rule inflicts significant, irreparable harm on states by imposing burdensome mail voting requirements that risk disenfranchising eligible voters. With the start of the general election season mere weeks away, states must bear the cost of redesigning their mail ballot envelopes and securing USPS review and approval before they can even register mail voters with USPS. Within a matter of weeks and without any additional resources, state election officials must also develop new systems to communicate mail voter lists to USPS to ensure that every eligible voter who is entitled to a mail ballot receives one. States must also create new guidance for election officials, train them on the new procedures, and educate the public about the changes prior to the upcoming election.
Even if states were to meet these enormous administrative and financial burdens, the rule could still result in eligible voters not receiving their ballots due to, for instance, administrative errors or flaws in the rushed and untested new procedures.
Over the past several decades, voting by mail has become more common across the country. In the 2024 general election, 765,695 Marylanders, about one-fourth of the of voters who participated in the election, cast their ballot by mail Since the inception of vote-by-mail, Congress has never exercised its authority to limit it, and in fact, has only taken action to expand and protect mail voting for military and overseas voters. Congress has also never authorized USPS to monitor or control the transmission of mail ballots.
The coalition argues that USPS’s rule violates the Constitution, which makes clear that states have the primary authority to administer elections, and upends successful, longstanding vote-by-mail procedures. The lawsuit argues that the rule is inconsistent with USPS’s governing statutes, ignores USPS’s procedural requirements, violates the Privacy Act, and is inconsistent with federal voting rights law. The coalition asks the court to strike down the unlawful rule and issue a temporary restraining order preventing the rule from taking effect while the litigation proceeds.
This USPS rule is the latest attempt by President Trump to exert federal control over elections and seize states’ constitutional authority to administer elections. In April, Attorney General Brown joined a coalition of 24 states in suing the Trump administration to block its unlawful Executive Order that prompted the creation of USPS’s rule. The suit succeeded, but the United States Supreme Court stayed any injunctive relief that stemmed from that success while the appeal of the suit is pending.
Joining Attorney General Brown in filing this lawsuit, which was co-led by the attorneys general of California, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington, are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaiʻi, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin, and the Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
###